Parts used in extreme conditions require extreme materials. The part may be a large ring or shroud in a jet engine, which operates at up to 1,200° F, or can be a down-hole component in an oil field, operating in a corrosive environment hundreds of feet underground.

So aerospace and oil and gas companies have many of their parts made from nickel-base alloys (heat-resistant superalloys). To turn these materials, which include Inconel, Hastelloy, Waspaloy and Monel, manufacturers should have their eyes firmly fixed on that humble cutting tool, the round insert.

Round inserts may be underutilized in some manufacturing sectors, but the aerospace and oil and gas industries shouldn’t be among them.

No Cutting Corners

Despite some major advantages, round inserts may be unattractive to manufacturers for several reasons. One is they can’t machine small-radius corners. For example, a 0.5 "-dia. round insert can’t turn a 90° corner with a radius of 0.004 ". Its smallest corner radius is 0.5".

The tool’s inability to create small-radius corners leads many parts manufacturers, and their programmers, to apply other insert shapes. “The CNMG is pretty much the first choice for any programmer because of the combination of flexibility and edge strength,” said Bill Tisdall, development specialist manager for toolmaker Sandvik Coromant Co., Fair Lawn, N.J. “You can OD turn, you can face, you can out-copy, you can turn to a square shoulder. With a round insert, you can’t turn to a shoulder. You can do all the other things.” (Out-copying is machine movement that combines a Z-axis movement toward the chuck with an X-axis movement away from the center line of the workpiece.)

Moreover, round inserts aren’t well suited to machining complicated profiles, like undercuts, and can’t create profiles not present in their geometry, according to Don Graham, manager of turning products for toolmaker Seco Tools Inc., Troy, Mich.

Finally, a round insert can more easily damage a workpiece than a straight-edged insert. A round insert has a relatively large radius compared with a straight-edged insert, which has small radii at its corners. A large radius means more contact surface, which results in higher cutting forces. “This can be detrimental when applied in weak setups, extended tooling or on workpiece features that have a thin cross section,” said Dale Hill, applications engineer for toolmaker Greenleaf Corp., Saegertown, Pa. Detrimental effects include workpiece deflection and vibration.

Consequently, parts manufacturers have to maximize machine tool and workholding rigidity if they want to successfully apply round inserts.

Reasons to be Round

Round inserts can be worthwhile, though, because they’re strong and can be fed at higher rates than other types of inserts, more than making up for their disadvantages in certain applications.

Time saved via higher feed rates means money saved. “The amount of money you can save [by using round inserts] over the life of running an insert is phenomenal,” Tisdall said, adding that actual cost savings depend on a shop’s overhead, annual number of components and reduction of a part number’s process time.

Graham estimated that round inserts can be fed 20 percent faster than other types of inserts, depending on the round tool’s chipbreaker, which can be designed for different feed rates. Graham cited a chipbreaker with a neutral land and relatively wide groove as an example, saying that a round insert can take a heavier feed rate than one with a positive rake and narrow groove width.

Round inserts can operate at higher feed rates because they have the strongest geometry. “The larger the included angle of the cutting edge, the more inherent strength you have in that insert,” said Frank Battaglia, staff engineer–global machining technology with Kennametal Inc., Latrobe, Pa.

He compared inserts’ different included angles; the 100°, 90°, 80° and 60° corners of various inserts, all the way down to a VNG-insert, which has a 35° angle. “The cross-sectional area, going from one side of that insert to the other, gets smaller and smaller as you go down in that angle,” Battaglia said. “With a round insert, it’s really just maximized to the point where you have the largest cross-sectional area going across from one side of the cutting edge to the other side.”

“There’s more material behind the force in a round insert, more material to absorb the force,” Graham added.

Their greater strength makes round inserts excellent at rough turning the scale present on forged and cast workpieces. Their strength also makes them less prone to chipping and breakage than other types of inserts.

Moreover, their strength and related long life mean round inserts are well suited to turning the large workpieces often manufactured by aerospace and oil and gas companies. “The round insert provides the best tool life and strength of any shape of an insert, so when you have a very large length of cut, you’re able to machine that full length with a round insert,” said Sandvik Coromant’s Tisdall. “With an angled insert, you’re typically going to get less tool life. You’d have to index the tool midcut.”

“Typically in aerospace, they will produce massive forgings,” Graham said. A 40 "-dia. ring that’s 0.5 " thick × 2 " wide may have started as a 48 "-dia. ring with a 6 " thickness and a 6 " width. “They remove massive amounts of material to produce that ring. That’s where a round insert is very useful because you can hog out a lot of material in an aggressive fashion,” Graham said.

Going Negative or Positive?

A parts manufacturer has to consider whether to apply a round insert with a negative geometry, a neutral one or a positive one for machining a nickel-base alloy.

According to Graham, producers of parts for oil and gas applications typically prefer negative or neutral rake angles on their round inserts because the angles provide extra strength. Those companies also like the inserts to have strong, heavy chip grooves.

Greenleaf’s Hill added that a negative rake angle is particularly suitable for interrupted turning. “When it engages the workpiece, the majority of that chip or swarf impacts that top surface of the insert, which is the strongest area of that cutting tool,” he said. “So, in interrupted turning you’re now presenting the strongest area of your cutting tool to that abusive situation.”

However, a negative rake angle tends to create greater cutting force, which may not be right for a particular application. Hill recommends the correct geometry for the job. “Use negative whenever possible for strength and economy—negative tools are generally double sided, allowing for more cutting edges. Use positive geometry if surface finish, tool force or built-up edge is a concern.”

Martin Gardner, global product manager—turning, threading and grooving for toolmaker ATI Stellram, La Vergne, Tenn., agreed. He suggested an RCMT insert, which has a 7° rake angle, for this application. “That’s probably the most popular insert we see in these types of applications,” he said. “They’re used for profiling and for narrow grooves.”

He also said round inserts need an edge hone that’s not too large because that would create too much cutting force.

To Coat or Not to Coat

Besides a round insert’s geometry, part makers for aerospace and oil and gas applications must consider whether they want a coated tool.

The carbide’s structure is the first consideration. Gardner recommended a submicrograin substrate for continuous cutting without vibration. Seco Tools’ Graham agreed. “The micrograin provides increased abrasion resistance as well as deformation resistance,” he said. “The latter is extremely important when you’re machining nickel-base materials. They generate a lot of heat and pressure [when cut].” A steel, for example, softens when it gets red hot, Graham noted, whereas a superalloy retains its strength and hardness when red hot. “So even when it’s red hot, it’s still putting a lot of pressure on the insert.”

Also, Graham recommended the tool have a PVD coating, not a CVD coating, when machining a high-temperature alloy with a hardness of greater than 32 HRC because PVD is usually thinner and therefore better maintains a tool’s edge definition. He added that PVD coatings are also preferred because of their resistance to wear, BUE and cratering—all common failure modes when machining nickel-base alloys.

However, Graham said inserts should have CVD coatings when they’re machining softer superalloys, like Inconel 600, because the predominant failure mode is cratering and a thicker coating better protects against cratering.

Sandvik Coromant’s Tisdall generally prefers that round inserts have a CVD coating in most applications. “A CVD grade will provide better tool life and higher-speed capability because the coating is typically much thicker.” He said, however, that a CVD coating is more prone to notch wear than a PVD coating because of the CVD process itself. According to Tisdall, the CVD process creates an eta phase in an insert’s carbide matrix, depleting the matrix of its cobalt binder, which acts to resist notch wear. Also, depleting the matrix of its binder weakens the carbide substrate.

Nonetheless, Tisdall prefers a CVD coating when machining superalloys with a round insert. “The strength and chip thinning effect of a round geometry makes up for the inherent weakness of the edge line,” he said. “When machining superalloys with an insert with a point angle—CNMG, DNMG or VNMG in combination with a small lead angle tool—a PVD grade is preferable.”

“Another key issue is a coating that will adhere to the edge line for a long period of time,” Tisdall said. “What you don’t want to do is finish a large aerospace component and find out that you’ve lost size because your coating has broken down halfway through the cut. You either are going to have to do a spring pass or you might scrap a part, and you are talking about a lot of money.”

Some aerospace companies still prefer uncoated inserts, though, because they worry about the coating contaminating parts during manufacture. “Obviously, they don’t want anything that’s going to erode or deform that structure, however minute it is,” said ATI Stellram’s Gardner. “There have been many studies about the coating diffusion into the parent material. We’ve never found that diffusion into the material with a PVD coat. That said, some manufacturers of aero engine components still like to use uncoated inserts.”

As good as they are, though, parts manufacturers may find coated, carbide round inserts insufficient for their use. “Their disadvantage is that they will be significantly limited in speed capability compared to ceramic cutting tools,” Kennametal’s Battaglia said.

He added, though, that carbide inserts are sometimes needed when a machine tool’s limitations or a part’s fixtures require running at lower speeds or during final finishing of critical aircraft components. “Often carbide is explicitly specified to be run at a low speed so that any possible damage or ‘white layer’ formation on the part surface is avoided,” Battaglia explained.

Chasing Ceramic

In a race, carbide—even a coated, submicrograin carbide—would be chasing ceramic at a long distance. “Say we take our best-case scenario of carbide—300 sfm on typical Inconel 718,” Greenleaf’s Hill said, adding that that speed involved light finishing, not roughing. “Ceramics are capable of running 800 to 900 sfm.”

Ceramics can run at such high speeds because their melting temperatures are much higher than the melting points of any metal they would cut. For example, a whisker-reinforced ceramic round insert—that is, a tool consisting of an aluminum-oxide matrix with silicon-carbide crystals—can have a melting temperature of slightly more than 2,000° C. Given such high melting points, ceramic inserts resist deformation and softening at very high temperatures.

Battaglia cautioned, though, that a ceramic round insert can still wear out if run too fast. Also, he recommended ceramic inserts’ cutting edges receive a chamfer, also known as a T-land or radius hone. He said the typical T-land has a width of 0.002 " to 0.004 " on the rake surface and an angle of 20° to 25°. “When you have a sharp-edged insert, that edge is susceptible to crack propagation,” he said. “When you add an edge preparation, you tend to direct those cutting forces more into the bulk of the material, so it makes it more difficult for a crack to propagate and lead to chipping of the cutting edge.”

According to Graham, a tool material exists for machining at even higher speeds than ceramics. “With CBN, you can run 1,000 sfm.”

A Kinder, Gentler Cut

Given their strength, it shouldn’t be surprising that round inserts need to be applied carefully to workpieces, even to high-nickel alloys.

For example, a round insert’s maximum DOC shouldn’t be more than 25 percent of the tool’s diameter. At more than 25 percent, the tool will have too much contact area with the workpiece, resulting in too much pressure and heat, Gardner said. “We’re going to just blow the insert away,” he added, “or we’re going to damage the component.”

To turn a pocket, Tisdall recommends trochoidal turning over plunging and turning to reduce potential damage to the round insert or part. In plunging and turning, an insert endures stress when plunged into a workpiece and moved across the material to turn it until it reaches where the pocket’s wall will be. The stress can lead to chipping and possibly catastrophic failure.

Trochoidal turning, however, involves smaller DOCs. “It’s a light plunge into a turn,” Tisdall said. “With a lighter DOC, you don’t have as much engagement of the insert when you come up to that wall.”

Tisdall also described a “roll-in method” of plunging and turning. A programming technique, the method includes a radius as an insert comes out of a plunge. “It’s another way of keeping the insert engaged with the workpiece without doing a sudden movement in a different direction. Let’s say you’re plunging in Z, and then you go to the X-axis and make a move in that axis. There’s a lot of stress on the insert. Here, we’re making use of a radius to basically make the process gentler on the insert.”

Also, a machine operator can vary a round insert’s approach angle to reduce chip thickness. “We’re always looking for thinning the chip,” Gardner said. “When we thin the chip with the approach angle, it gives us better productivity; we create less heat. The more heat we put into them, the more friction we create, the more [heat] these materials will throw back,” producing a burned-out insert. Protecting the tool from burn-out doesn’t mean applying it timidly, though.

Round inserts can’t cut small-radius corners and aren’t well suited to creating complicated profiles, but the tools have the strongest shape of any insert and can be applied at high feed rates. With appropriate rake angles and cutting strategies, the round insert is excellent at the extreme task of turning high-nickel alloys to create parts for the extreme environments inside jet engines and down-hole in oil fields.